Until last week there are two things I would have been able to say about 3D: In the 80's I saw Creature From the Black Lagoon in 3D and took off my 3D glasses halfway through because they annoyed me so much. And Stephen King said that if he ever made enough money, he'd have a pair of prescription 3D glasses made. I hope he did, I like him. *g*
Personally, I have no need for movies to be "more realistic or whatever they're supposed to be because they're 3D. If the story isn't enough to pull me in and keep me, stuff flying off the screen at me isn't going to keep me.
And, of course, I'm a glasses-wearer. I really wonder if the movie people realize how many people wear glasses and/or have eye problems that make the whole proposition impractical and/or painful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-06-11 01:57 pm (UTC)But last week I read a very interesting post about it (from a link on Joseph Gordon-Levitt's tumblr). http://rcjohnso.tumblr.com/post/24693276556/some-thoughts-on-3d
Personally, I have no need for movies to be "more realistic or whatever they're supposed to be because they're 3D. If the story isn't enough to pull me in and keep me, stuff flying off the screen at me isn't going to keep me.
And, of course, I'm a glasses-wearer. I really wonder if the movie people realize how many people wear glasses and/or have eye problems that make the whole proposition impractical and/or painful.