rheasilvia: (Default)
[personal profile] rheasilvia
I have a story up on AO3 with a "rape/non-con" archive warning. Today, I received a (very polite and not at all flamey!) comment remarking that the rape was difficult to read, and that a trigger warning might have been a good idea.

Incidentally, I also thought that a trigger warning would be a good idea for this story. That's why I used the archive warning.

Now I'm wondering - did the reader overlook the warning, or did she feel there should have been another warning within the text itself to mark the passages in question? I suspect I'm not entirely up to date on the eternal "warnings" discussion.

Date: 2013-11-02 08:54 pm (UTC)
amalthia: (Default)
From: [personal profile] amalthia
This happened to my friend, she wrote a graphic rape scene, used the Rape/Non-con warning then someone complained it wasn't enough so she added additional tags and then someone read those tags and complained that they misread them into thinking the rape/non-con wasn't going to be graphic. Truly, at this point I have zero sympathy...If it's in the "Warning" field proceed with caution! There is no winning.

Profile

rheasilvia: (Default)
rheasilvia

June 2020

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829 30    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 08:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios